Society & Civilization 2019 AZM's list
Heading Home
《回归家庭》
- Published
- 2019
- Category
- Society & Civilization
- Original language
- en
- Source list
- Gender Studies, Feminism & Family
Structural violence and why women step back from their careers.
Imported from a third-party reading list or added as a daily pick — bibliographic facts, the source framing, and a full reading guide.
Source theme
Structural violence and why women step back from their careers.
What is this book about?
The British sociologist Shani Orgad interviewed highly educated professional women who left their careers, one after another, after having children. She traces how it happened: not in a single decision but through a series of choices that look free — flexible work, childcare costs, career penalties, partners who do not share the load. Assembled together, they reveal a gentle structural violence pushing women back into the home. Her subject is why the language of free choice fails here.
Why read it?
It is institutional criticism within feminist sociology, the reverse of the bestsellers that treat going home as a personal preference. Its place is to take apart the language of balancing family and career, showing that the balance is posed as an individual problem. The gain is learning to ask, after hearing that she chose it herself, under what conditions the choice was made.
Core Ideas
- The absence of public childcare and of an equal workplace amounts to structural violence against women.
- When highly educated women break off careers, it is usually not one decision but an accumulation of small ones.
- The phrase free choice hides the set of conditions under which the choice was made.
- Childcare costs and partners who do not share the load are the key variables pushing women out of work.
What questions does this book try to answer?
- Do professional women really choose to go back home of their own accord?
- How does structural pressure push women back into the home, step by step?
Who should read it?
For professional women, young parents, and readers concerned with women's situation at work and at home; also for couples currently deciding about children, who might read it together. It is an interview-based sociological study: the material is concrete and the conclusions carry a position.
How to Read It
It shows that many women's return home was not a free choice but a forced compromise under career penalties and the absence of public childcare. A caution: this is interview-based research with a sample concentrated on highly educated women in Britain, whose childcare system and workplace culture differ from China's, so the findings need translating. The author's position is explicit, so keep her narrative and her case apart. Read it beside Ueno's Letters.