Society & Civilization 1990 XMS's list
Soulstealers
《叫魂》
- Published
- 1990
- Category
- Society & Civilization
- Original language
- en
- Source list
- Politics, Sociology & Historical Reflection
A Qianlong-era sorcery panic reveals how autocratic power and bureaucracy work.
Imported from a third-party reading list or added as a daily pick — bibliographic facts, the source framing, and a full reading guide.
Source theme
A Qianlong-era sorcery panic reveals how autocratic power and bureaucracy work.
What is this book about?
In 1768, during the Qianlong reign, a fear of soul-stealing sorcery spread from the lower Yangzi across the empire: sorcerers, it was said, could take a person's soul by clipping his queue. Drawing on Qing palace archives — memorials, confessions, interrogation records — Philip Kuhn reconstructs how a local rumour became a nationwide political purge, and how emperor, governors, and magistrates each calculated their own advantage within it. The result is less a story of superstition than a study of how an imperial state talks to itself.
Why read it?
It is a model of microhistory: one specific panic is used to show how autocratic power and grassroots society interlock. The throne's anxiety about legitimacy, the bureaucracy's logic of self-preservation, and popular hostility and opportunism all become visible in a single case. What you learn about imperial power comes from archival detail rather than abstraction, and it is a pleasure to read.
Core Ideas
- The throne's anxiety about its own legitimacy combined with a grassroots psychology of mutual harm to ignite the nationwide panic.
- Ordinary people gained a temporary and dangerous kind of power by denouncing and falsely accusing others.
- The bureaucracy survived by deceiving both ways: stalling upward, shifting blame downward, arresting rather than risking failure.
- Beneath the so-called golden age lay a structural crisis, and the panic was one of its eruptions.
What questions does this book try to answer?
- How does an autocratic system use social panic to tighten its hold on power?
- What are the roots of the mutual predation and informing among ordinary people?
- Why would an age that calls itself prosperous be especially prone to collective panic?
Who should read it?
For students of Chinese history and readers of political sociology — and for anyone who wants to understand how a rumour becomes policy and how panic is used by power. No historical training is needed, though patience with an archive-driven narrative helps.
How to Read It
The reading angle from the source list: treat the panic as one eruption of a structural crisis beneath a so-called golden age — ordinary people gaining temporary power through denunciation, the bureaucracy surviving by deceiving both upward and downward. Carry that thread through the book: the point is not to judge the superstition but to see each party's position and calculation. The standard Chinese translation is by Chen Jian and Liu Chang.